Monday, February 9, 2015

Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance)

Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) (Alejandro González Iñárritu, 2014)
Click here for the basics
Rating: Q=7, P=8 / Obsession
Scale 1=3, Scale 2=4, Scale 3=4, Scale 4=4

Acting, Fame, Social Commentary, Existential, Surreal, Dark Comedy, Mid-life Crisis

"...You're doing a play based on a book that was written 60 years ago, for a thousand rich old white people whose only real concern is gonna be where they go to have their cake and coffee when it's over. And let's face it, Dad, it's not for the sake of art. It's because you want to feel relevant again. Well, there's a whole world out there where people fight to be relevant every day. And you act like it doesn't even exist! Things are happening in a place that you willfully ignore, a place that has already forgotten you. I mean, who are you? You hate bloggers. You make fun of Twitter. You don't even have a Facebook page. You're the one who doesn't exist. You're doing this because you're scared to death, like the rest of us, that you don't matter. And you know what? You're right. You don't. It's not important. You're not important. Get used to it."

Wow. This film exceeded my already supremely high expectations. I enjoyed every perfect line, every quirky moment, all the intertextuality and playful artistry. Perhaps my favorite part was the cinematography and editing--it feels really different than most films, like one incredibly long take-- but I also fell in love with the entire atmosphere that González Iñárritu created. We humans live in a confining space, a space we all wish we could fly away from. We are all selfish (to varying degrees) and strive for glory, fame, a legacy, something to bring meaning to our seeming insignificance. The desperation can sometimes be pathetic, sometimes hilarious, but always honest.

Layers and layers of meaning, very thought-provoking. Michael Keaton was a brilliant choice. I will definitely watch this again.

--Don't understand the ratings? Click here

39 Steps

39 Steps (Alfred Hitchcock, 1935)
Click here for the basics
Rating: Q=6, P=5 / Average OJ
Scale 1=3, Scale 2=3, Scale 3=3, Scale 4=2

Mystery, Spy, Crime, Suspense, Thriller, Film Noir

I studied Hitchcock in college but focused mainly on his works in Hollywood. It feels weird that I haven't seen some of his early, British classics. But last night I finally watched 39 Steps. It is beautiful. Beautiful shots with all the shadows and lines of expressionism. Great acting, especially from Robert Donat. I often forget how brilliant he was. And the plot is perfect, the transitions and dialogue, every revealing moment. You can see how Hitchcock would go on to make some of the best films of all time. If you are in the mood for a classic mystery, this may be it.

--Don't understand the ratings? Click here

Thursday, February 5, 2015

In A World

In A World (Lake Bell, 2013)
Click here for the basics
Rating: Q=5, P=5 / Average OJ
Scale 1=2, Scale 2=3, Scale 3=3, Scale 4=2

Comedy, Father/Daughter, Complex Relationships

This is a fun, light-hearted comedy about much more than just voice-over actors. It's about pride, competition, taking risks, and doing what you love. Lake Bell and Dmitri Martin are sweet and hilarious. If you like voice acting, accents, and quirky nerd-stuff, you'll enjoy this.

--Don't understand the ratings? Click here

Monday, February 2, 2015

Tim's Vermeer

Tim's Vermeer (Pen Jillette and Teller, 2013)
Click here for the basics
Rating: DOCQ=8, DOCP=8 / First Rate
Scale K=3, Scale L=3, Scale M=4, Scale N=3

Documentary, Art, Technology, History

Growing up around paintings and drawings, knowing many artists, and being a different kind of artist myself, I've always had an enormous respect for the amount of patience and dedication one must have to create. I fully understand writer's block and have spent many hours playing chord progressions with no results. So, Tim's Vermeer was a treat of a film--Tim says he isn't an artist, yet he creates a near exact replica of Vermeer's studio and then paints a version of a Vermeer in just over four months. He learns to hold a paintbrush, mixes his own paint, grinds his own lens, and then sits for countless hours to observe and paint what he sees. He has ample curiosity to discover how Vermeer worked, he does research and experiments. How is this not an artist? If Vermeer used a lens to paint (which is pretty likely), does this make him less an artist?

One must certainly have talent and imagination to be a good artist, and one must learn skills. But sometimes we underestimate the value and importance of having the right tools. There are plenty of budding geniuses out there who will never know they have talent, never be discovered because they don't have access to paints or canvas or books...This is a wonderful film that really makes you think about definitions and meanings.

--Don't understand the ratings? Click here